Synthesis, In-vitro and In-silico Anti-inflammatory activity of new Thiazole derivatives
Kumaraswamy Gullapelli1*, Ravichandar Maroju1, Ramchander Merugu2
1Dept. of Chemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad – 500075.
2Dept. of Biochemistry, Mahatma Gandhi University, Nalgonda – 508254.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: kumargullapelli001@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The present study is aiming at synthesis of new heterocycles like benzimidazole nucleus containing Pyrazole, isoxazole and thiazoles. The title compounds were synthesized from 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) oxazol-2-amine (1). The title compounds were evaluated for their in vitro anti-inflammatory activity and showed excellent to moderate activity and molecular docking studies were supporting anti-inflammatory activity exhibiting high inhibition constant and binding energy. The chemical structures of the synthesised compounds were characterized by IR, 1HNMR, Mass spectroscopic techniques.
KEYWORDS: Synthesis, Benzimidazole, thiazole, pyrazole, isoxazole, In vitro anti-inflammatory activity, molecular docking.
1.0. INTRODUCTION:
Over the last decade, derivatives of benzimidazoles have received very much attention in medicinal chemistry.10-11 The current study reports the synthesis of most versatile compound benzimidazole containing oxazole, thiazole, pyrazole and isoxazole which exhibit various biological properties like antitubercular12-13, antifungal14, anthelmintic15, analgesic16-17, antimicrobial18-19 and antibacterial20 and anti-inflammatory activities.21
Hence, in this direction efforts have been undertaken to introduce most active and biologically versatile molecules containing nitrogen, oxygen and sulphur heterocyclic compounds like 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)oxazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydrothiazolo[4,5-c]isoxazole and 4-(1H-benzo[d] imidazol-2-yl)-2-(3,5-diphenyl-3,3a-dihydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]thiazol-6(5H)-yl)oxazole derivatives which were synthesized from 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)oxazol-2-amine.
2.0. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION:
2.1. Materials and Methods:
The reaction progress was monitored by TLC plates. Infra red Spectrum of compounds were recorded by Perkin Elmer BX series and 1HNMR spectra were recorded by Bruker 400 MHz instrument using DMSO as solvent and Tetramethylsilane used as an internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in ppm. Mass spectrums of compounds were measured on a GC/MS-QP1000EX (EI, 70 eV) mass spectrometer. Elemental analysis was performed on PerkinElmer 240 CHN analyzer.
Table:1 Physical data of Synthesized compounds 5, 6 and 7 (a-e)
Compounds |
5a |
5b |
5c |
5d |
5e |
R |
Ar |
4-CH3- Ar |
4-OCH3- Ar |
4-OH- Ar |
4-NO2- Ar |
M.P ( 0C ) |
250-52 |
255-57 |
256-58-26 |
251-53 |
258-60 |
Yield (%) |
78 |
82 |
79 |
80 |
75 |
Compounds |
6a |
6b |
6c |
6d |
6e |
R |
Ar |
4-CH3- Ar |
4-OCH3- Ar |
4-OH- Ar |
4-NO2- Ar |
M.P ( 0C ) |
255-57 |
258-60 |
260-62 |
259-61 |
263-65 |
Yield (%) |
82 |
78 |
76 |
81 |
74 |
Compounds |
7a |
7b |
7c |
7d |
7e |
R |
Ar |
4-CH3- Ar |
4-OCH3- Ar |
4-OH- Ar |
4-NO2- Ar |
M.P ( 0C ) |
258-60 |
261-63 |
264-66 |
261-63 |
265-67 |
Yield (%) |
80 |
81 |
76 |
73 |
74 |
2.2.General reaction procedure for Compound 4:
A mixture of Benzaldehyde (0.004 mol) and 4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) thiazol-2-amine22 (3) (0.004 mol) were refluxed in ethanol for about 4h with few drops of glacial acetic acid. Reaction progress was monitored by TLC method. Reaction mixture was cooled, filtered and dried followed by recrystallisation with methanol to afford the corresponding Schiff’s base (4).
General reaction procedure for Compound 5:
Equimolar mixture of compound 4 (0.01), mercapto acetic acid (0.01), Aromatic aldehyde (0.01) in 1, 4 dioxane (30 ml) containing a pinch of ZnCl2 was refluxed for 6.5 hours. The resulting solution was filtered and cooled in ice bath. The resulting solid product was filtered, washed with 10% NaHCO3 and recrystallized from Alcohol. The compounds 3(b-e) were prepared by similar procedure with minor changes in reaction conditions.
2.2.1. (Z)-3-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-benzylidene-2-phenylthiazolidin-4-one (5a): IR (KBr, cm-1 ): 3328 (NH),1548(C=N), 1665 (C=O), 1230(C=S); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm): 5.92(s,1H,N-CH-Ar), 6.55 (S,1H, CH Ar), 7.12-7.22(m,4H, Ar-H), 7.26-7.48(m,5H, Ar-H),7.56-7.74 (m,5H,Ar-H),9.85 (bs,1H,NH). MS, m/z(%),466 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H17N3OS: C, 66.93; H, 3.89; N, 12.01%. Found: C, 66.23; H, 3.72; N, 11.68%.
2.2.2. (Z)-3-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-(4-methylbenzylidene)-2-phenyl thiazolidin-4-one (5b):
IR (KBr, cm-1):3337(NH), 2960(C-H), 1561(C=N), 1672 (C=O), 1249 (C=S); 1HNMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm): 2.85(s,3H,CH3), 5.86(s, 1H, N-CH-Ar) , 6.54(s, 1H,CH Ar); 7.15-7.24(m,4H Ar-H), 7.28-7.38( m, 4H,Ar-H), 7.42-7.64( m,4H,Ar-H), 9.96(bs, 1H,NH): MS,m/z(%), 480(M+); Anal.Calcd for C27H20N4OS2: C,67.48; H,4.19;N, 11.66% Found: C, 67.08;H,3.90; N,11.05%.
2.2.3. (Z)-3-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-(4-methoxybenzylidene)-2-phenyl thiazolidin-4-one (5c):
IR(KBr,cm-1):3341(NH),3045(C-H),1561(C=N),1682(C=O),1238(C=S);1HNMR(DMSO-d6,400 MHz, δinppm): 3.45(s,3H,OCH3),5.72(S,1H,N-CH-Ar),6.58(s,1H,CHAr);7.18-7.25(m,4H,Ar-H),7.26-7.51 (m,5H, Ar-H), 7.65-7.84 (m,4H, Ar-H),10.06(bs,1H,NH), MS, m/z (%), 496 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C27H20N4O2S2: C, 65.30; H, 4.06; N, 11.28%.Found: C, 65.04; H, 3.86; N, 10.85 %.
2.2.4.(Z)-3-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-2-phenylthiazolidin4one (5d):
IR(KBr,cm1):3514(OH),3346(NH),1568(C=N),1685(C=O),1238(C=S);1HNMR (DMSO-d6,400 MHz, δ inppm): 5.88 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.56 (s ,1H, CH Ar);7.14-7.27(m,4H,Ar-H),7.25-7.49(m,5H,Ar-H),7.58-7.71(m,4H,Ar-H),10.11(bs,1H,NH), 11.28 (s, 1H, OH), ;MS, m/z (%), 482 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H18N4O2S2: C, 64.71; H, 3.76; N, 11.61%. Found: C, 64.42; H, 3.42; N, 11.38%.
2.2.5.(Z)-3-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-(4-nitrobenzylidene)-2-phenyl thiazolidin-4-one (5e):
IR (KBr, cm-1): 3340 (NH),1572(C=N), 1523 (NO2), 1685 (C=O), 1238(C=S); 1HNMR (DMSO-d6,400MHz, δ in ppm): 5.85 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.58 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.13-7.26 (m,4H, Ar-H),7.25-7.48(m,5H, Ar-H), 8.15-8.34 (m,4H, Ar-H),10.18(bs,1H,NH),MS, m/z (%), 511 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H17N5O3S2C, 61.04; H, 3.35; N, 13.69%. Found: C, 60.84; H, 3.05; N, 13.22%.
2.3.0. General reaction procedure for compound 6:
A mixture of compound 5a (0.03mol), hydrazine hydrate (0.03mol) and anhydrous CH3COONa (0.001mol) in glacial acetic acid (30ml) was heated under reflux for about 7 h, it was cooled at room temperature and poured into crushed ice. The solid was filtered, washed with water and recrystallized by using ethanol to afford the pure compound. The compounds 6(b-e) were prepared by similar procedure with minor changes in reaction conditions.
2.3.1. 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) thiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo [3,4-d]thiazole (6a):
IR (KBr, cm-1): 3348 (NH), 3078 (C-H ring), 1546(C=N), 1238 (C=S), 1042(N-N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm):4.85 (d, 1H, CH-N), 4.62 (d, 1H, CH-S), 5.90 (s,1H,N-CH-Ar), 6.56 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.10-7.22(m,4H, Ar-H), 7.26-7.45(m,5H,Ar-H),7.55-7.78 (m,5H, Ar-H), 9.75 (bs, 1H,NH). MS, m/z(%),480 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H20N6S2: C, 64.98; H, 4.19; N, 17.49%. Found: C, 64.58; H, 4.02; N, 17.18%.
2.3.2.6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)-3,3a,5,6-tetra hydro -2H-pyrazolo [3,4-d]thiazole (6b):IR (KBr, cm-1 ): 3342 (NH),3084(C-H ring), 2963 (C-H), 1565 (C=N), 1249 (C=S), 1052(N-N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm): 2.82 (s,3H,CH3),4.82 (d, 1H, CH-N), 4.60 (d, 1H, CH-S), 5.81 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.51(s,1H, CH Ar); 7.18-7.26 (m,4H, Ar-H), 7.28-7.38(m,4H, Ar-H), 7.45-7.68 (m,4H, Ar-H), 9.98 (bs, 1H,NH).MS, m/z (%), 494 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C27H22N6S2: C, 65.56; H, 4.48; N, 16.99%. Found: C, 65.34; H, 4.28; N, 16.55%
2.3.3. 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetra hydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]thiazole(6c):IR(KBr,cm-1):3343(NH),3039(C-H),1559(C=N),1241(C=S)1063(N-N);1HNMR (DMSO, d6,400MHz,δinppm):3.48(s,3H,OCH3),4.82(d,1H,CH-N), 4.60(d,1H,CH-S),5.74(s,1H,N-CH-Ar), 6.58 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.21-7.28 (m,4H,Ar-H), 7.31-7.58 (m,5H,Ar-H),7.68-7.87 (m,4H,Ar-H),10.04 (bs,1H,NH), MS, m/z (%), 510 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C27H22N6OS2:C, 63.51; H, 4.34; N, 16.46%. Found: C, 63.31; H, 4.18; N, 16.16 %.
2.3.4.4-(6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d] thiazol -3-yl)phenol (6d): IR (KBr,cm-1):3516(OH), 3352 (NH),1571 (C=N), 1242 (C=S) 1043 (N-N);1HNMR(DMSO-d6,400 MHz, δ in ppm): 4.72(d,1H,CH-N), 4.61 (d,1H, CH-S), 5.92(s,1H,N-CH-Ar),6.53(s,1H,CH Ar);7.18-7.31 (m,4H,Ar-H), 7.28-7.52 (m,5H,Ar-H), 7.61-7.74 (m,4H,Ar-H), 10.15 (bs,1H,NH), 11.35(s, 1H,OH) ;MS, m/z (%), 413 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H20N6OS2: C, 62.88; H, 4.06; N, 16.92%. Found: C, 62.62; H, 3.86; N, 16.52 %.
2.3.5.6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6tetrahydro-2Hpyrazolo [3,4-d]thiazole (6e):IR ( KBr, cm-1 ): 3346 (NH), 1575 (C=N), 1528 (NO2), 1236 (C=S),1052(N-N) ; 1HNMR (DMSO-d6,400MHz, δ in ppm):4.91(d,1H,CH-N), 4.75 (d,1H, CH-S), 5.88 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.62 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.16-7.29 (m,4H, Ar-H), 7.28-7.52 (m,5H, Ar-H), 8.18-8.41 (m,4H, Ar-H),10.22 (bs,1H,NH),MS, m/z (%), 525 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H19N7O2S2: C, 59.41; H, 3.64; N, 18.65 %. Found: C, 59.12; H, 3.35; N, 18.34%.
2.4. General reaction procedure for compound 7:
A mixture of compound 5a (0.03 mol), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.03mol) and anhydrous CH3COONa (0.001 mol) in glacial acetic acid (30ml) was heated under reflux for about 7h, cooled at room temperature and poured in to crushed ice. The resulting solid product was filtered, washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol to afford the pure compound. The compounds 7(b-e) were prepared by similar procedure with minor changes as per the reaction conditions.
2.4.1.6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydrothiazolo[4,5-c] isoxazole (7a): IR (KBr, cm-1): 3348 (NH), 3078 (C-H ring), 1546(C=N), 1238 (C=S); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm):4.95 (d, 1H, CH-O), 4.72 (d, 1H, CH-S), 5.90 (s,1H,N-CH-Ar), 6.58 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.10-7.22(m,4H, Ar-H), 7.26-7.45(m,5H,Ar-H),7.55-7.78 (m,5H, Ar-H), 9.75 (bs, 1H,NH). MS, m/z (%), 481 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H19N5OS2: C, 64.84; H, 3.98; N, 14.54%. Found: C, 64.25; H, 3.45; N, 14.24%.
2.4.2. 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro thiazolo[4,5-c] isoxazole (7b): IR (KBr, cm-1 ): 3342 (NH),3084(C-H ring), 2963 (C-H), 1565 (C=N), 1249 (C=S) ; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, δ in ppm): 2.82 (s,3H,CH3), 4.98 (d, 1H, CH-O), 4.75 (d, 1H, CH-S), 5.81 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.61 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.18-7.26 (m,4H, Ar-H), 7.28-7.38(m,4H, Ar-H), 7.45-7.68 (m,4H, Ar-H), 9.98 (bs, 1H,NH).MS, m/z (%), 495 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C27H21N5S2: C, 65.43; H, 4.27; N, 14.13%. Found: C, 65.12; H, 4.04; N, 13.89%.
2.4.3.6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro thiazolo [4,5-c]isoxazole(7c):IR(KBr,cm-1):3343(NH),3039(C-H),1559(C=N),1241(C=S);1HNMR(DMSO-d6,400MHz, δ in ppm):3.48 (s,3H,OCH3),5.12 (d,1H,CH-O),4.74 (d,1H,CH-S), 5.74(s,1H,N-CH-Ar), 6.64 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.21-7.28 (m,4H,Ar-H), 7.31-7.58 (m,5H,Ar-H),7.68-7.87 (m,4H,Ar-H),10.04 (bs,1H, NH), MS, m/z (%), 511 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C27H21N5O2S2: C, 63.38; H, 4.14; N, 13.69%. Found: C, 63.05; H, 4.05; N, 13.21%.
2.4.4.4-(6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro thiazolo [4,5-c]isoxazol-3-yl)phenol(7d):IR (KBr,cm-1): 3516(OH), 3352 (NH),1571 (C=N), 1242 (C=S); 1HNMR(DMSO-d6,400 MHz, δ in ppm): 5.08 (d,1H,CH-O), 4.72 (d,1H, CH-S), 5.92 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.63 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.18-7.31 (m,4H,Ar-H), 7.28-7.52 (m,5H,Ar-H), 7.61-7.74 (m,4H,Ar-H), 10.15 (bs,1H,NH), 11.35 (s, 1H,OH) ;MS, m/z (%), 497 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H20N6OS2: C, 62.76; H, 3.85; N, 14.07%. Found: C, 62.76; H, 3.85; N, 14.07%.
2.4.5.6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro thiazolo [4,5 -c] isoxazole(7e): IR ( KBr, cm-1 ): 3346 (NH), 1575 (C=N), 1528 (NO2), 1236 (C=S); 1HNMR (DMSO-d6,400MHz, δ in ppm):5.14 (d,1H,CH-O), 4.85 (d,1H, CH-S), 5.88 (s,1H, N-CH-Ar), 6.65 (s,1H, CH Ar); 7.16-7.29 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.28-7.52 (m,5H, Ar-H), 8.18-8.40 (m,4H, Ar-H),10.22 (bs,1H,NH),MS, m/z (%), 526 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C26H18N6O3S2: C, 59.30; H, 3.45; N, 15.96%. Found: C, 58.90; H, 3.15; N, 15.56%.
3.0. In-Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity:
About 5 ml of reaction mixture which includes 0.2 ml of egg albumin, 2.8 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.4) was added with 2 ml of compounds at 50 and 100 µg/ml and double-distilled water with same volume was used as control. The prepared mixtures were incubated at a temperature of (37±2)0C in BOD incubator for about 15 min and followed by heating at 700C for about 5 min. After attaining the room temperature, absorbance was measured at 660 nm using vehicle as blank and viscosity was determined by using Ostwald viscometer. Diclofenac sodium was used as standard drug23 and its concentrations were maintained at 50, and100 µg/mL.
The inhibition (%) of protein deanaturation was measured using the following formulae
% Inhibition = 100 X (Vt/Vc-1)
Where, Vt= Test sample Absorbance, Vc= Absorbance of control
Table2: In vitro anti-inflammatory activity of compounds (6a-e) and (7a-e) percentage of inhibition (%)
Compounds |
6a |
6b |
6c |
6d |
6e |
7a |
7b |
7c |
7d |
7e |
Standard |
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
50 |
40 |
41 |
44 |
43 |
45 |
42 |
43 |
44 |
43 |
46 |
48 |
100 |
74 |
75 |
78 |
76 |
85 |
75 |
77 |
84 |
83 |
88 |
90 |
The drug concentration for 50% inhibition (IC50) was determined by plotting percentage inhibition with respect to control against treatment concentration.
Table: 3 In vitro anti-inflammatory activity of compounds (6a-e) and (7a-e) percentage of inhibition in IC 50 (%):
6a |
6b |
6c |
6d |
6e |
Standard |
|
IC 50 |
5.1±2.4 |
6.5±2.3 |
7.9±0.5 |
21±0.5 |
17±1.0 |
28 ± 0.5 |
Compounds |
7a |
7b |
7c |
7d |
7e |
Standard |
IC 50 |
10.±1.5 |
09±0.7 |
24±0.1 |
15.±2.3 |
14.5±2.1 |
32±0.5 |
Each value in the table is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Values in the same column followed by a different letter (a-e) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Inhibitions of protein deanaturation of the compounds are shown in the descending order: 7e>6e>7c>7d>6c>7b>6d>7a>6b>6a>
4.0. IN SILICO ANTI-INFLAMMATORY STUDIES:
The molecular docking was done using the molecular docking server24-25. The cycloxygenase enzyme was downloaded from the PDB (Protein data bank) and was docked to the title compound and the results are displayed below.
Docking studies of 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenyl-3,3a,5,6-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo [3, 4-d] thiazole (6a):
Figure 1: Docking pose showing the interaction between the enzyme and the ligand 1
Table 4: Free energy of binding between the enzyme and the ligand 1
Est. Free Energy of Binding |
vdW + Hbond + desolv Energy |
Electrostatic Energy |
Frequency |
Interact. Surface |
|||||||
-6.06 kcal/mol |
-7.15 kcal/mol |
-0.04 kcal/mol |
50% |
689.87 |
|||||||
Various types of interactions between the amino acids of the enzyme and the ligand 1 |
|||||||||||
polar |
hydrophobic |
pi-pi |
other |
||||||||
N5 (20) |
GLU67 (OE1, OE2) |
C23 (31) |
CYS57 (CB) |
C18 (26) |
C19 (27) |
GLN54 (CB) |
|||||
[2.88] |
[3.89] |
[3.24] |
[3.79] |
||||||||
N6 (21) |
GLU67 (OE1, OE2) |
|
C19 (27) |
N4 (15) |
GLU67 (CB, CG) |
||||||
[3.22] |
[3.88] |
[3.63] |
|||||||||
H9 (43) |
GLU67 (OE1, OE2) |
|
|
C11 (16) |
GLU67 (CB, CD, CG, OE1, OE2) |
||||||
|
|
|
C9 (12) |
GLU67 (CB) |
|||||||
[3.69] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
N3 (11) |
GLU67 (CB) |
|||||||
[2.93] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
N2 (9) |
GLU67 (CB) |
|||||||
[3.69] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C12 (17) |
GLU67 (CD, CG, OE2) |
|||||||
|
|
|
N5 (20) |
GLU67 (CD, CG) |
|||||||
[3.11] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C22 (30) |
GLU67 (CG) |
|||||||
[3.77] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
N6 (21) |
GLU67 (CD) |
|||||||
[3.41] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
H9 (43) |
GLU67 (CD) |
|||||||
[3.08] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C14 (22) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
|||||||
[3.48] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C15 (23) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
|||||||
[3.32] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C17 (25) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
|||||||
[3.28] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C3 (3) |
THR71 (CG2) |
|||||||
[3.42] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C2 (2) |
THR71 (CG2) |
|||||||
[3.19] |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
C1 (1) |
THR71 (CG2) |
|||||||
[3.69] |
|||||||||||
Docking studies of 6-(4-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl) thiazol-2-yl)-3, 5-diphenyl-3, 3a, 5, 6-tetrahydrothiazolo [4, 5-c] Isoxazole (7a):
Figure 2: Docking pose showing the interaction between the enzyme and the ligand 2
Table 5: Free energy of binding between the enzyme and the ligand 2:
Est. Free Energy of Binding |
vdW + Hbond + desolv Energy |
Electrostatic Energy |
Frequency |
Interact. Surface |
|||||||||||
-6.40 kcal/mol |
-6.93 kcal/mol |
-0.51 kcal/mol |
50% |
568.269 |
|||||||||||
Interactions between the amino acids of the enzyme and the ligand 2: |
|||||||||||||||
hydrogen bonds |
polar |
hydrophobic |
pi-pi |
Other |
|||||||||||
N5 (20) |
TYR55 (CD2, CE1, CE2, CZ, O, OH) |
H5 (39) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
C18 (25) |
CYS57 (CB) |
C11 (14) |
TYR55 (CD1, CE1) |
C11 (14) |
GLN54 (CB) |
||||||
[3.12] |
[3.86] |
[3.25] |
[3.61] |
[3.88] |
|||||||||||
N4 (15) |
GLU67 (CD, OE2) |
|
C19 (26) |
CYS57 (CB) |
C10 (13) |
TYR55 (CD1, CE1) |
C10 (13) |
GLN54 (CB) |
|||||||
[3.24] |
[3.63] |
[3.35] |
[3.80] |
||||||||||||
N5 (20) |
GLU67 (CD, CG, OE2) |
|
C19 (26) |
CYS59 (SG) |
|
O1 (21) |
TYR55 (CE2) |
||||||||
[3.35] |
[3.56] |
[3.45] |
|||||||||||||
N3 (11) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
|
|
|
C17 (24) |
LYS56 (NZ) |
|||||||||
[3.08] |
[3.81] |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C22 (29) |
LYS56 (NZ) |
||||||||||
[3.48] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
O1 (21) |
CYS57 (SG) |
||||||||||
[3.88] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C12 (16) |
GLU67 (CD, CG, OE2) |
||||||||||
[3.28] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C13 (17) |
GLU67 (CG) |
||||||||||
[3.45] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
O1 (21) |
GLU67 (CG) |
||||||||||
[3.29] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C23 (30) |
GLU67 (CD, OE1, OE2) |
||||||||||
[3.39] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C24 (31) |
GLU67 (OE1) |
||||||||||
[3.68] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C9 (12) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
||||||||||
[3.20] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
C8 (10) |
GLU67 (OE2) |
||||||||||
[3.89] |
|||||||||||||||
5.0. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The present study reports the synthesis of oxazolo-pyrazole and oxazolo-isoxazole derivatives linked with benzimidazole in good yield. The compound 4 (Schiff base) is synthesized using 2-amino benzimidazole with Benzaldehyde under simple conditions. The compound 5 (Chalcone derivatives of thiazolidinone) is synthesized by cyclization of one-pot three-component method using compound 4, mercaptoacetic acid and substituted aromatic aldehyde using anhydrous Zinc chloride26. Later, the derivative of thiazolidinone (5) undergoes cyclized with hydrazine hydrate and hydroxyl amine hydrochloride in the presence of anhydrous acetic acid to afford the compound 6 and 7respectively. The structures of title compounds were confirmed based on spectral and analytical data. The compounds showed Infra red absorption bands at 3348 cm-1 (NH), 1564 cm-1 (C=N), 1238 cm-1 (C=S), 1042 cm-1(N=N), 1680 cm-1 (C=O) respectively. Proton NMR spectra of synthesized compounds showed singlet signals at 5.58 for N-CH-S, 6.56 Singlet thiazole proton signal at 6.56, doublet signals at 4.62 CH-S, 4.82 CH-N, and 9.82ppm for NH protons and also phenylic protons as multiplet in the range of 7.10-8.41ppm. Mass spectra of synthesized compounds showed a molecular ion peak at m/z concerning their molecular weights.
In vitro anti-inflammatory activity:
The synthesized derivatives were tested for their efficacy to inhibit the protein deanaturation. The process is carried out by using egg albumin. All the compounds showed concentration dependent inhibition property. Compounds (7e and 6e) are found to exhibit significant inhibition percentage compared to other synthesized compounds. Nevertheless, Compounds (7c, 6c, 7d and 6d) are competed in exhibiting a notable activity with good inhibition percentage (table 2). On the other hand, the compounds 6b and 7a were showed moderate activity. The variations in the activity might be due to different functional groups present in derivatives. By these studies, it is concluded that benzimidazole derivatives showed preliminary anti-inflammatory activity.
The IC50 values represented in table 3 are shown as mean ±SD. According to the data, the IC50 24±0.1, 21±0.5 of compounds 7c and 6d are significant and are comparable with standard Diclofenac sodium standard.
In silico anti-inflammatory activity:
Molecular docking studies have shown that the ligand 1 has a binding energy of -6.06 kcal/mol (table 4). Figure 1 shows the docking pose between the enzyme and the ligand 1where, different amino acids are bind to the active site of the ligand. Various types of interactions between the ligand1 and amino acids of enzymes are shown in table 4 where the major amino acids involved in binding are gluatamic acid, cysteine, tyrosine, glutamine and threonine at the active site. Docking studies have shown the ligand 2 has a binding energy of -6.40 kcal/mol (table 5). Figure 2 shows the docking pose between the enzyme and the ligand 2 where various amino acids bound to the active site of the ligand. Various types of interactions between the ligand 2 and amino acids of enzymes are are shown in table 5 where the major amino acids involved in binding are tyrosine, gluatamic acid, glutamine, cysteine and lysine. Compared with ligand 1, ligand 2 has higher free energy of binding and could act as a better anti inflammatory compound.
6.0. CONCLUSION:
It has been concluded that a series of pyrazolo-thiazoles and isoxazole-thiazoles linked with benzimidazole was synthesized and it has been reported in the present work that the title compounds are exhibiting excellent in vitro and in silico anti-inflammatory activity.
7.0. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are grateful to the Principal, Management of MGIT–Hyderabad and IICT- Hyderabad for their constant support and also thankful to the Department of Bio-Chemistry, Mahatma Gandhi University-Nalgonda, India.
8.0. REFERENCES:
3. Singh A K, Ekta K , Chauhan H S . Evaluation of Benzimidazole Derivatives by using Aldehydes. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014; 7(6): 677-685.
5. Varsha A D , Rohini R P. Synthesis of some Sulphur and Nitrogen containing Heterocyclic Compounds. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 7(1): 21-24.
6. Gullapelli K, Bhaskar P, Brahmeshwari G, Synthesis and antibacterial activity of substituted -1-(tosyl/methylsulphonyl-1Hindole-2-yl) methyl 1-H-Indoles. Asian J. Research Chem. 2014; 7(5): 509-512.
8. Hassan S, Thamson Müller JJ. Multicomponent syntheses based up on copper catalyzed alkyne –azide Cycloaddition, Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015; 357(4): 617-666, DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201400904.
11. Prabha T, Aishwaryah P, Manickavalli E, Chandru R, Arulbharathi G, Anu A, Sivakumar T. A Chalcone Annulated Pyrazoline Conjugates as a Potent Antimycobacterial Agents: Synthesis and in Silico Molecular Modeling Studies. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(8): 3857-3865.
12. Kalkotwar R S, Saudagar R B. Design and, synthesis and antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, Antitubercular activities of some 2,4,5 –trisubstituted imidazole derivatives. Asian J Pharm. Res. 2013; 3(4): 159-165.
18. Hitesh V. S, Rakesh D. A. Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Diphenylamino Isoxazoline Derivatives. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2018; 8(3): 148-150.
20. Hemalatha K, Niranjan Raj D, Fousia Begam M, Sharanya V K , Girija K. Synthesis, Characterization, Docking study and Anti-Bacterial Evaluation of Benzimidazole Derivatives as Biotin Carboxylase Inhibitors. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2017; 7(2): 109-114.
21. Gupta V , Girendra Kumar G ,Yadav S K . Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of substituted Benzimidazole hydrazine Carboxamide derivatives for Anti-inflammatory activity. Int. J. Tech. 2017; 7(2): 90-95.
23. Sangita Ch, Priyanka Ch, Protapaditya D, Bhattacharya S. Evaluation of Anti-inflammatory Effect of Ashwagandha: A Preliminary Study in vitro. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2012; 4: 47-49.
24. Bikadi Z, Demko L and Hazai E. Functional and structural characterization of a protein based on analysis of its hydrogen bonding network by hydrogen bonding plot. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007; 461: 225-234.
25. Bikadi Z, Hazai E. Application of the PM6 semi-empirical method to modelling proteins enhances docking accuracy of Auto Dock, J. Chem Inf. 2009; 1: 15.
26. K. Gullapelli, K. Dhanaja, M. Ravichander, M. Ramachander. G. Brahmeshwari, Synthesis, antitubercular and molecular docking studies of new biheterocyclic compounds on benzimidazole moiety, Rasayan J. Chem., 2020; 13(1): 585-592. doi.org/10.31788/ RJC. 2020. 1315465.
Received on 13.04.2020 Modified on 24.09.2020
Accepted on 12.01.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(8):4253-4260.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00738